Our Relationship - The Alfieri Version

Update as of 10-15-2018 -- The case has been dismissed by both parties.  As we have agreed to move forward, the dismissed case will remain confidential.

Alfieri's Original Version

The following excerpts are from Victor's complaint. What is alleged in his complaint tells the story of our relationship according to him.

"In becoming involved in the production of Bond, TREVINO made every effort to maximize the level of personal contact between herself and ALFIERI. Thus, in addition to wanting to invest in the production, TREVINO offered to edit the Arturo Bond screenplay and be ALFIERI's personal assistant. TREVINO also insisted on acting as the bookkeeper for BONDOLINI. At TREVINO's insistence, ALFIERI gave TREVINO access to the BONDOLINI account into which TREVINO's investment funds were deposited. From June of 2010, ALFIERI also gave TREVINO access to his telephone; his computer and his email account. However, the-volume of increasingly flirtatious messages and telephone calls also grew prompting ALFIERI to remind TREVINO that although they were friends, their relationship was primarily a business relationship."  

"Once on set, TREVlNO resumed her attempts to become physically involved with ALFIERI, hugging him and rubbing his back even in the presence of ALFIERI's mother. Once again, ALFIERI had to ask TREVlNO to curtail her flirtatious behavior. At that point, it became apparent to ALFIERI that TREVlNO was intent on having a sexual relationship with him." 

"While on set, TREVlNO also became involved with the actors and their various intrigues, both on set and on internet social sites. This made ALFIERI's management of the Production and the actors much more difficult." 

"Once ALFIERI returned from Italy, TREVlNO was relentless in her attempts to see him insisting that they meet for various reasons including obtaining records in order to do the bookkeeping. However, she also made it clear in her email messages that she was in love with him and wanted a "personal" relationship rather than just a professional relationship."  

"Given TREVlNO's past overtures, ALFIERI was very hesitant about meeting her alone. ... However, after ALFIERI complained about TREVINO's romantic advances, on June 17, 2011,TREVINO wrote him an email in which she acknowledged that ALFIERI did not requite her romantic desires and assured him that those desires had passed..."  

"Nonetheless, ALFIERI did not want to meet TREVINO in private and therefore agreed to meet her at a coffee shop..." 

"At his manager's urging, ALFIERI did, however, agree to meet TREVINO for lunch on her birthday on July 21,2011. After they had finished their lunch and were standing in the restaurant, parking lot, TREVINO grabbed hold of ALFIERI and tried to kiss him. Without letting him go, she asked him to have sex with her, stating that they both needed to 'release some stress.' When he refused, she asked that he at least email her a picture of his 'c--k' which she could masturbate to. ALFIERI was embarrassed by the scene they were making in public, and so to put an end to it, agreed to send her a picture. Later that evening TREVINO texted him demanding the photograph. In response ALFIERI emailed her a link to a photograph of a dildo for sale on Hustler's website. TREVINO's email response was that she would rather have ALFIERI's 'live' organ."  

"After these occurrences which had taken place despite TREVINO's assurances that her amorous intentions had passed; ALFIERI. was resolute in his intention not to again meet with TREVINO alone. When she urged him to meet with her for the 'accounting,' he responded that he wanted to go over the budget and expenditures with her in the presence of his attorney."  

"When TREVINO realized that there would be no meeting alone with ALFIERI, her interest in 'bookkeeping' vanished and she was suddenly too busy to meet with ALFIERI and his attorney. She was not, however, too busy to attempt to organize something for ALFIERI's 40th birthday (July 30th). She initially contacted ALFIERI's manager for that purpose, falsely stating that ALFIERI's mother had asked her to organize something for his birthday. No one in fact had asked her to do anything of the kind. Ultimately, however, ALFIERI told TREVINO that he did not wish to spend his birthday with her."  

"Apparently, finally realizing that her fantasy of a sexual relationship with ALFIERI would never be realized, TREVINO became overtly hostile to ALFIERI and to his conduct of the Production. Asserting that ALFIERI had misled her regarding her true powers as 'Executive Producer,' on August 9" 3,2011, TREVINO announced in an email message to ALFIERI, his manager and his attorney that she was taking over the Production and that, as Executive Producer, she would thenceforth have the final word. Apparently realizing that her obsession with ALFIERI had become obvious to all around her, and hoping to appear as being the injured party, TREVINO went on to send another email to ALFIERI, his attorney and his manager falsely stating that she had, in fact, had a sexual relationship with ALFIERI for more than a year." 

"Realizing that TREVINO's obsession with him had reached a crescendo and that she was now out to wreck both his reputation and the production of Clara, ALFIERI removed TREVINO's access to BONDOLINI's remaining funds by transferring those funds to a BONDOLINI account to which TREVINO had no access."   

"Since that time, TREVINO has falsely represented to everyone connected with the Production that ALFIERI stole money from her. TREVINO has also repeated to others the misrepresentation that she had engaged in a sexual relationship with ALFIERI. TREVINO has made these misrepresentations to others both orally and in writing."  

"TREVINO drafted an email addressed to ALFIERI's mother wherein she repeated her misrepresentation that she had a sexual relationship with ALFIERI, repeated her misrepresentation that ALFIERI had stolen her money and indicated that she was reporting him to the police. TREVINO had the message translated into Italian and on August 4, 2011, she emailed the message to ALFIERI's mother. When ALFIERI's mother could not thereafter reach ALFIERI by telephone, as a result of her panic, she suffered a physical condition which required her hospitalization."

--- From Alfieri's Complaint 

Summary of Alfieri's First Version of How the Relationship Developed

• Fan (false)
• Personal Assistant (false)
• Investor/Financier (true)
• Stalker (false)
• Hostile Slanderer (false)
• The Enemy (according to him... true)

Second Version - The Deposition

By the time Victor was deposed on August 16, 2012, he had already had the opportunity to review proof of my allegations against him that contradicted the previous story he told in his original complaint.

Watch the following video. It summarizes his second version of how our relationship developed.

So.... does his story make sense????

• Fan - He did not say I was a fan but he did say that he signed several pictures and "cover" movies??? Maybe he meant covers of  DVD cases? He did give me an autographed picture for my niece and another one for me. This happened six months after we had become close friends and lovers. He knows that I was never his fan. I would joke about it by saying that I wanted his autograph anyway. This became an inside joke for us.

• Amnesia - It is strange that Victor suddenly forgot everything during his deposition. It really was as if he had just gotten amnesia. Roger Muse, his attorney probably instructed him to say he did not remember instead of lying. He clearly overdid it. It was obvious that Victor was lying about not remembering because he was laughing as he was saying "I don't remember."

• Assistance for Back Pain - He did remember this specific event - his back injury. I did offer to help him when we were chatting on facebook. When we met in person, he did not expect me to do anything for his back pain. 

• Amnesia - During his deposition he could not remember what happened when we met again in early June, 2010. Please go to "How We Met" to see what happened during that meeting in June. He gets amnesia again up to the point when, according to him,  I "insist" on becoming an investor and his personal assistant.  

• Personal Assistant - We were already friends and lovers when I jokingly said that I would be his personal assistant. I was NEVER his personal assistant. Why would I?  I was the one with the Engineering degree, the Master's in Business Administration, the owner and CEO of a business. Plus, I was the "financier" of his projects???? Does that make sense... to be his personal assistant?  He stated that I had access to his phone, email account, personal computer... as he said, I had access "at everything." Read post "Premeditation".

• Investor/Financier - It is true that I became an investor. At first he was also an investor - we were basically business partners.  Then he pulled all his money out leaving me as the sole "financier" of the movie project. He knows that the MAIN reason I became an investor is because he and I were romantically involved and because I loved him. I told him several times, in person and in writing (text messages, emails and letters).

• Close Friend - This is probably the only thing he said that was truthful. I was a very good friend to him. I was always there for him.... "no matter what," as he, himself said.

I only agree with two points in this second version. I was indeed the investor/financier of Victor's project(s) and a close friend.

In both versions, he claimed that I was his personal assistant and had access to his phone, email and computer. He claimed I answered his phone and used his personal computer. Why would he allow me access to all that after the "obsessive sexual harassment" started? He stated, under oath, that I had access to his phone until June 17, 2011, until the break-up or conflict, as he called it. Read the post "premeditation" to learn WHY he claimed I was his personal assistant. There is a BIG reason why he said that. "Premeditation will be published in a few days.

During his deposition he got very defensive when he was asked about the tattoo close to his lower pelvis. He claimed that there are pictures all over facebook in his underwear. I, myself never saw those pictures. The tattoos I was referring to cannot be seen if he's dressed (even in underwear). He knew what I was talking about and got upset to be confronted. Did you also notice that he mentioned pictures of a gladiator type movie he shot where you can see his tattoos??? Isn't that ridiculous??? Gladiators did NOT have tattoos. Actually, all his tattoos were covered for that movie.

He admits that we were very close friends, that I was always there for him, that I took him to the hospital when he cracked a rib. So, if he considered me such a good friend, why would he claim in his written complaint that I was sexually harassing him??? Wouldn't close friends have a conversation about this???  Would anyone treat a "close" friend the way he treated me????

All of these questions will be answered in my next post, "Our Relationship - The Trevino Version - PART 1" And don't forget to read Part 2 as well.

Disclaimer – As of October 15, 2018, all legal issues have been resolved. This resolution was reached during arbitration. There are no pending issues related to fraud or theft. The resolution was mutually agreeable. There will be no more posts written about this story.

Last Communication With Alfieri

Update as of 10-15-2018 -- The case has been dismissed by both parties.  As we have agreed to move forward, the dismissed case will remain confidential

 -----


January 4, 2013 - I asked Victor to not include the money used to sue me as part of the budget. It was bad enough that he took my own money to sue me... and he wanted to include that in the budget???

I have learned with this experience that I have to be clear as to what I want and what I don't want, as to what I agree and don't agree with. I did not want to be scared anymore of asking what I wanted. I was VERY clear in my message to Victor. I did not want any more misunderstandings.

Victor,

I had not received these reports before. I only had one.  Thanks for sending them.

Just so you know. I consulted with my attorney and I have been told that you CANNOT use the funds I invested to sue me, especially after MY money was taken and concealed  without authorization.   So you need to pay for Muse's services yourself. You initiated the action, therefore, MY FUNDS cannot be used to sue me.

It would have been different if Bondolini had been sued first and you were protecting the film. I have grounds to sue you for this. And you would LOSE.

You have also taken the liberty to use my funds without authorization or written agreement. You have not kept me informed as to budget increases or ANYTHING.

Victor, you have breached our contract repeatedly. I could easily sue you and Bondolini now with allegations that I can prove. If I were to do so, the movie would not get distributed. I really do not want to start a legal war again.  So this is what I propose:

As to the Expenses in Italy

*We can stipulate that what I contributed - around 56,000 euros -to the Italian budget covered ALL the expenses. You are missing most of the receipts and many are handwritten by you (not legally valid). We also stipulate that your contribution to the Italian budget is ZERO.

As to the $17,500 you took from my investment without my approval

*This is where you would be found guilty right away for converting my funds and for using my money to take legal action against me with false and slanderous allegations.

So I am NOT agreeing to one penny you spent of this money. You understand, right?  You told me repeatedly that you had not touched the money. I still have all those emails. You attorney also told us that the funds had not been CONVERTED - which was a complete lie.

What I agree to do is to have you return those funds to the budget and have those funds be used to finish the movie.

As to the Money you Spent and want reimbursed

I will be very generous here. I did see receipts for the editor and the sound/music people. I am willing to allow those expenses as part of the budget. You should pay for your own expenses and for those meals during meetings with people. 

Your trip to Italy last year should not be covered. I don't agree with any of those expenses. 

I am agreeing to only $14,060 (please see attachment)

Bottom Line is

$17,500 is returned to the budget (You return this money, or simply stop claiming it as reimbursable expenses)

$14,060 is used to pay for editing, sound/music

We are left with $3,440. 

You get an investor for $15,000 by the end of the month.

That investor can get her/his $15,000 back along with my investment first position (NOT BEFORE ME). So if we sell the movie for 50k, we will split it accordingly. His/her 20% ($3,000) comes after first position is paid. So we could say that her 20% is second position with every other second position deferred payment. I also want to be present when this contract is signed and the money received. I am ok with 1% of revenues for this person. This person gets a co-executive producer credit with Josh not EP credit. 

You don't get an Executive Producer credit as you have not invested money in the movie. You have used the funds without authorization and you know that that is a breach of contract and you are subject to legal action. If you get a loan instead of another investor, then you can get an EP credit yourself.  

You still get your $16,000 deferred second position payment plus 50% of whatever the movie makes (after paying points, of course). I also get my 50%.

I believe that after reviewing all the financial statements, I am being very reasonable and generous with you.  

Thanks 

Adriana Trevino

Victor replied. I have added my comments in parenthesis.

Adriana  

it is very simple : you have attacked on Aug 3rd 2011 Bondolini and Alfieri. (I did not attack him. I simply asked for my contract to be respected and disclosed information about our intimate relationship. That is NOT an attack. He took my money and concealed it. Who attacked whom?) 

On Sept 7th 2011 you hired yor first attorney and started attacking legally both Bondolini and Alfieri. (Attacking legally???? Asking for my money back or for at least proof that it had not been spent?) 

On Sept 15th 2011 Bondolini and Alfieri took legal actions. (I think it is funny that he always says legal actions instead of action. He used my money immediately to pay Roger Muse to sue me. He filed the lawsuit on September 21, 2011) 

Bondolini used its funds. (Victor and Bondolini used MY funds against me).  

Victor Alfieri used his funds (over 40k) to defend himself. (I bet this is a lie. He financed the whole litigation with the money he took from me.)

everthing is on paper. So do what you need to do but stop blackmailing me or my company. (No blackmailing, just trying to negotiate)

office will be closed now. (What office???)

good weekend

 Then I wrote to him again.

I am not blackmailing you.  I am being nice and generous to you.  

So you are saying NO to my proposal?  It is very simple. Just go to bottom line. I don't see any threats. 

This is all you need to read -  

Bottom Line is 

$17,500 is returned to the budget (You return this money, or simply stop claiming it as reimbursable expenses) 

$14,060 is used to pay for editing, sound/music 

We are left with $3,440.  

You get an investor for $15,000 by the end of the month. 

That investor can get her/his $15,000 back along with my investment first position (NOT BEFORE ME). So if we sell the movie for 50k, we will split it accordingly. His/her 20% ($3,000) comes after first position is paid. So we could say that her 20% is second position with every other second position deferred payment. I also want to be present when this contract is signed and the money received. I am ok with 1% of revenues for this person. This person gets a co-executive producer credit with Josh not EP credit.  

You don't get an Executive Producer credit as you have not invested money in the movie. You have used the funds without authorization and you know that that is a breach of contract and you are subject to legal action. If you get a loan instead of another investor, then you can get an EP credit yourself.   

You still get your $16,000 deferred second position payment plus 50% of whatever the movie makes (after paying points, of course). I also get my 50%. 

Please let me know if this is agreeable with you.  Our previous agreement will be respected, of course.  

Have a good weekend! 

Adriana 

 This is the last email I received from Victor that day. My comments are in parenthesis.

Not agreed. 

I invested funds and i need to recoup the money. (This is questionable. Proof is needed).

Since you are talking about suing again and had  already consulted with an attorney i take this as a threat. (I was not talking about suing him again. I just mentioned that I could sue him for what he did.)

Please have your attorney contact my attorney. 

There is no need for us to continue emailing back and forth since we cannot come to a legal agreement. (Legal agreement???? Alfieri, just respect the original agreement and show proof of legitimate expenditures!)

I will notify my lawfirm (He owns a law firm now???)

My opinion is that it is IMPOSSIBLE to work with Victor Alfieri. He does NOT listen and is stubborn. It is his way or "the legal route." It is not surprising that the already evident problems with this film project escalated when I spoke my mind and asked for what I thought was fair.

And this is my last email to Alfieri.

I just said I asked my previous attorney about a legal question. I did not say that I had hired an attorney. I was not talking about suing again, at all. Why would I do that? I am trying to come to an agreement with you! 

You claim to have invested funds, I understand. You spent about 20k paying Muse when you could have avoided that. 

Don't act out of anger again. Remember what happened last time? You sued me with FALSE allegations and things got out of hand. Do you want that to happen again? 

Victor, you need to listen to people when you want to come to a fair agreement. You negotiate only from your side and take offense when someone says what she/he wants.  You don't have to agree with what I say. I don't have to agree with what you say. But we can come to a mutual understanding. 

I don't want to start a war again. I really don't. 

Adriana Trevino

This email exchange with Victor motivated me to speak up and tell my truth. That is how this BLOG was created. It was time for me to stop hiding and tell the truth. 

Disclaimer – As of October 15, 2018, all legal issues have been resolved. This resolution was reached during arbitration. There are no pending issues related to fraud or theft. The resolution was mutually agreeable. There will be no more posts written about this story

How the Lawsuit Against Me Was Financed

Update as of 10-15-2018 -- The case has been dismissed by both parties.  As we have agreed to move forward, the dismissed case will remain confidential.

Financing?

On January 3, 2013, Victor and I were emailing back and forth. I still had not seen the bank statements for the account he opened in August 2011 - the account where my $17,500 were deposited. From August 3, 2011 to March 2012 -when he dismissed his lawsuit against me -  he had claimed that this amount had not been touched and it would ONLY be used to produce the movie.

I suspected that Victor had used my money to pay Roger Muse to sue me. And that is what I say in the first email. However, I had no proof at this point. Victor avoided the issue every time I asked for the bank statements.

I asked him again to tell the truth about our relationship. A press release had been published on December 20th, clearing his name. I was asking him to do what I considered to be THE RIGHT THING.

Hi Victor, 

You mentioned that the Editor gave you Cut 5. Is there a way I can see that?  I am supposed to be forwarded the cuts.  I would like to see the latest cut. 

I have been working on a couple of film productions this past year. I have been with the executive producer's team raising funds to get these movies financed. Now that I have more experience I realize that getting the funds is the MOST difficult part of any independent film production.  

I gave you the enormous gift of totally financing the movie you wrote because I believed in you, trusted you and loved you. I also saved your home from foreclosure here in California. Who has done anything like this for you in your life??? You in turn, lied to everyone (including your attorney) about our relationship, painted me as some psycho fan obsessed with you... and used the rest of MY investment to sue me. You understand that if you had not concealed and used my money to try to destroy me, there would be enough cash to finish the movie?

I also want to let you know that I will soon be publicly disclosing personal information and details about our intimate/sexual relationship. Even Roger said that I was free to do so. I will tell my whole story.  It is unfortunate for you that my story contradicts yours. So, a suggestion to you is a public apology to me for lying and for accusing me of sexually harassing you when in reality you and I were lovers.  You know that this would be the right thing to do. I cleared your name as to the fraud, knowing that you DID take MY money to sue me and get rid of me. It is your turn to make a public statement and tell the truth about our relationship. 

I will respect the agreement we have to finish and distribute the movie. I do want to see this movie released and would love to get all of my investment back.  And just for your consideration, I am making this offer again - Get a new investor. Pay me $200,000 to cover my investment and my attorneys fees and I will not be attached to this movie again. You can have that new investor as the Executive Producer. .. Or maybe you can sell your land or one of your 2 homes in Italy. Remember that you wanted me to buy that piece of land with all those olive trees??? So strange that you offered to sell it to me and later, during your deposition, denied ever owning any land or property in Italy. 

Please keep me updated on post-production and let me know if you are willing to make a public statement about our relationship. I would actually like a public apology.  

We are starting the year. It would be great to start with integrity... by telling the truth.

My best wishes for you for 2013. May this year bring you happiness and success!!! 

Adriana 

He did reply immediately.  I will only include portions of his emails, as they are very long and mainly talk about "business."

Good day Adriana

It is very unfortunate that Bondolini have encountered two lawsuits but with great efforts I am still working and finishing the film.

I want to finish and sell this film and you must know that negative press will diminish its quality.

So I professionally advise you not to talk (anymore) negative about this film, the director or its cast, If the cast has problems with the movie I am sure they will take actions on their own.

The status of my very last update is still standing.

-------

Best wishes

---

Bodolini Productions

Victor Alfieri

I replied to his email.

Victor,

I thought you said I could keep the copy I had. I have no problem returning it. I can pick up CUT 5 from your or your neighbor and drop off the DVD I currently have. 

My business address is in Minnesota. It does NOT make sense to mail it there. So, as I said before I will be picking the DVD up personally.  As I know that you don't want to see me face to face, please have your neighbor or your personal assistant/girlfriend hand it to me. I am not going to Muse's Office. I will not waste my time going to BH and paying for parking.

I appreciate your "professional" advise to me not to say anything negative about the film, the director (you) or the cast.  What I would say would not be about the cast or the movie, it would be about our relationship and you, of course.  It won't be necessarily negative. It will be simply the TRUTH.  I remind you that in this country we all have freedom of speech. I have the right to speak up. Nobody can stop me.  

Victor, we were lovers! We were planning on building a production company together! I gave you my life savings because I loved you and believed in your talent. I risked EVERYTHING for you!!!!  If you believe what I felt for you was merely an obsession, you have clearly never been truly in love. I did love you... like nobody will ever love you again in this lifetime. And I also respect and love myself...That is why I have decided to speak up and tell my story. I want to live my life with integrity and impeccability. I am doing this for me, not to hurt you in any way. I always cared about you. You know that. 

I still believe that a public apology would be the best option for you and the right thing to do.  Think about it and let me know if you are willing to make a public statement before I disclose everything, ok? 

As to the original receipts, blog and contracts, we had agreed that I would return them when I got the final movie (ready to be distributed).  I will give you all the originals back when I recover my investment. For now, you have copies of everything and your accounting is complete.

Take care and enjoy the rest of the week.

Adriana Trevino 

Victor replied. 

Adriana-

Your idle threats are unnecessary and irrelevant; again I asked you (in my previous emails) to keep your emails professional and strictly business. You agreed.

In order to sell and finish the movie Bondolini needs the following:

*US$ 15,000. 

Then he goes on to educate me about "deliverables" using information he googled...  He does NOT address the questions I am asking.

January 4, 2013 - The following day I write this email to Victor, giving him another opportunity to tell the truth.

Victor,

I will provide all the documentation (originals) when I am provided with the final cut of the movie ready to be distributed. I will deliver them to you exactly at the same time I get the DVD. I have no problem with that. As to the DVD, I don't have to meet at your place, you can have one of your girlfriends or personal assistants deliver it to me at the Coffee Bean on Sunset Blvd.

I said I would invest my 17,500 (what you took without my authorization from the account) to finish the movie. Too bad you used that money to try to destroy me - you showed me proof that you took my own money to pay MUSE to file a complaint against me with FALSE allegations.

I want to see proof of the 45+ you claim you spent yourself. I have not seen that. Also, I know you altered some of the numbers for the Italian budget. I know how much actors were paid and you stated the wrong amounts. I was there and saw as many were paid and the amount they were paid. I made note of all that. I am not going to argue this point. I just want proof of the 45,000 you claim you spent.

As to my "idle" threats.... I have not threatened you. I am just letting you know what I am doing - which is my right.  I am going to tell the truth.  I do have more friends in the media than you know. And I am asking you again... are you willing to offer a public apology to me???? If your answer is no, ok... you won't tell the truth... then I will. I will not warn you again.  I will simply disclose EVERYTHING, ok?

For now, let's separate the personal issues and try to get this movie distributed.  I am still the person who financed the movie. I expect you to treat me with respect and consideration.   That new investor - I do NOT agree that this person gets his/her money before me.  I agree that we combine my investment and his/hers and be paid first position. His/her 20% should be paid AFTER  the first position total is reimbursed.  Per my contract, I know I have a say here. I have to authorize any changes in the budget.  The original budget was $130,000. Anything over that had to go through me. So this is what I am agreeing on.  I also want notarized copies (not by Josh's girlfriend) of his/her contract and the check (investment).  In fact, I would like to be present if possible when this happens.  You probably understand that I don't trust you and would like to witness all of this.

One more thing - I believe that your "strategy" to have this movie be like the "Blair Witch Project" is a terrible idea. First of all, the quality of the "picture" looks too good for anyone to believe it was filmed with a personal handheld camera. This movie already got publicity with the scandal YOU started. We should take advantage of that and market it that way... we should have ridden the media scandal.  It is my opinion... and that of many other people I have talked to who have been in the movie production field way longer than you.  I expect to see this movie on IMDb soon.  Before then, I will NOT believe you have the intention to distribute this movie.

Let me know when I can get CUT 5 and when I can return the Director's Cut. I can meet with one of your "associates" at the Coffee Bean on Sunset as I said.  I am not going to Muse's office.

Adriana Trevino

Victor Alfieri emailed me the bank statements I had been requesting for over a year. Victor withdrew $10,400 from the account that contained the "disputed" funds to pay Roger Muse to sue me. He claimed that he was protecting Bondolini Productions and the movie. What was there to protect? I had not sued him. I merely asked for my money back.What did he do??? He used that very same money to sue me. I was no longer speculating... I had proof now.

Bank Statements

I was the financier of Victor's lawsuit against ME!

Disclaimer – As of October 15, 2018, all legal issues have been resolved. This resolution was reached during arbitration. There are no pending issues related to fraud or theft. The resolution was mutually agreeable. There will be no more posts written about this story